Clinton, Edwards, Obama..... Leaders, Likeable, Winnable?: The Swamp
 
The Swamp
-
Posted January 31, 2007 8:25 AM
The Swamp

Posted by Mark Silva at 8:25 am CST

If many Democrats are feeling uneasy these days, it may have something to do with the way they perceive their front-runners in the campaign for the party's 2008 presidential nomination.

While likely Democratic votes view Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York as most likely to win the party's nomination, and while Clinton out-paces Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois and former Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina in a number of measures -- with many more voters viewing Clinton as most qualified to be president -- a new survey shows that Obama is viewed as more likeable than Clinton. The survey also accords the senator from Illinois higher ethical standards than the senator from New York.

"The most promising dimension for Obama, and by contrast Clinton's weakest area, is with respect to human relations,'' says a report from the Gallup Poll on its survey that shows Clinton rated not only as most qualified among likely Democratic voters, but also the strongest leader, best debater, best in a crisis and best manager. Yet another telling response: Fewer than 50 percent of those likely Democratic voters surveyed say Clinton has the best chance of beating the Republican nominee. And then again, only 27 percent perceive Edwards as having the best chance, 21 percent Obama. For more on the way Democrats are sizing up the three, see the survey:

January 31, 2007

Clinton Eclipses Obama and Edwards on Leadership
Obama enjoys a softer image as likable, a uniter

by Lydia Saad

GALLUP NEWS SERVICE

PRINCETON, NJ -- Sen. Hillary Clinton's front-runner status in the opening chapter of the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination race -- she leads with 29% of Democrats compared with 18% for Sen. Barack Obama and 13% for former Sen. John Edwards -- carries over into her dominance over the other two top Democratic contenders in perceived leadership qualities.

A new Gallup Panel survey asked Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents to compare Clinton, Obama, and Edwards on 15 different positive personal characteristics. Of these, Clinton is perceived to best exemplify eight characteristics, she and Obama are about tied on four, and Obama leads on three.

Among the characteristics and qualities tested, Clinton's strong points are almost uniformly related to presidential leadership. She holds a formidable lead on many items in this category, including being qualified to be president and being a strong leader.

Obama leads on personal warmth, but with much slimmer margins than what Clinton enjoys for leadership. Democrats are most likely to choose Obama as the one who would do the most to unite the country and as the most likable. Edwards ranks third on most dimensions, but does relatively better in perceptions of how the candidates are received beyond the party base -- by Congress, with foreign leaders, and the general public.

Clinton's Competency

Clinton is widely perceived among Democrats as having what it takes to do the job of president. Her greatest strength is the perception that she is "the most qualified to be president." Six in 10 Democrats say this quality most applies to Clinton, versus 21% naming Edwards and 13% choosing Obama.

Other related Clinton strengths are that she is widely perceived as the "strongest leader," would perform best in the debates, would be best in a crisis, would manage the government most effectively, and would work the best with Congress.

Additionally, by a 36-point margin over Edwards and a 42-point lead over Obama, Clinton enjoys a solid reputation as the candidate to beat for the 2008 Democratic nomination. Fifty-eight percent of Democrats believe Clinton has the best chance of winning the nomination. She enjoys a slightly smaller lead on being best able to defeat the Republican nominee in the 2008 general election, with 44% choosing Clinton, 27% Edwards, and 21% Obama.

Hillary Clinton Image Strengths

These are the percentages rating the candidates in each of these categories:

Most qualified to be president:

Clinton: 61
Edwards: 21
Obama: 13

Is the strongest leader:

Clinton: 59
Edwards: 15
Obama: 22

Has the best chance of winning the Democratic presidential nomination in 2008:

Clinton: 58
Edwards: 22
Obama: 16

Would perform the best in debates:

Clinton: 57
Edwards: 10
Obama: 29

Would be the best in a crisis:

Clinton: 54
Edwards: 20
Obama: 20

Would manage the government most effectively:

Clinton: 53
Edwards: 21
Obama: 21

Would work the best with Congress:

Clinton: 46
Edwards: 25
Obama: 25

Has the best chance of beating the Republican nominee in the 2008 presidential election:

Clinton: 44
Edwards: 27
Obama: 21

Not only is Clinton perceived as having the best leadership credentials, but according to the same Jan. 25-28, 2007, Gallup Panel survey, she is chosen over the other two candidates as best able to handle 9 of 10 specific issues across a broad spectrum of policy areas. As discussed in another article on galluppoll.com, she is preferred by an outright majority of Democrats on healthcare, education, the economy, and energy and the environment. (See "Democrats Give Clinton Edge on Most Issues Over Obama, Edwards" in Related Items.) She holds smaller leads on terrorism, the situation in Iraq, relations with other countries, taxes, and crime. Only on "moral values issues" does one of the other candidates -- Obama -- tie with Clinton on perceived ability to handle an issue.

Competitive Image Territory

Gallup finds more parity among the three top Democrats with respect to perceptions of who would most likely be respected by leaders of other countries, who would run the most positive campaign, and who best understands the problems that ordinary Americans face.

Clinton and Obama are closely matched on these dimensions, while at least 20% choose Edwards on all but public speaking. These data suggest Clinton strategists might seek to brush up her image in these areas, and that Obama strategists might seek to emphasize them to play to his strengths.

Cultivating a Human Touch

The most promising dimension for Obama, and by contrast Clinton's weakest area, is with respect to human relations. This is apparently a weakness the Clinton campaign seems well aware of, as exemplified by framing her campaign as a "conversation" that she will take to people's living rooms via her Web site. As CNN political correspondent Candy Crowley recently opined, the backdrop for Clinton's presidential exploratory announcement -- "the warm lighting and the big sofa" -- was "an obvious attempt to try to connect and relate to people, many of whom think that she comes across as aloof, and that there's some sort of barrier there."

According to the Gallup survey, only 31% of Democrats today choose Clinton as the most likable of the three candidates tested. Obama wins this category with 41%, while Edwards is not far behind Clinton, with 24%. The results are similar to perceptions of which of the three would do the most to unite the country.

Obama also leads Clinton -- 39% vs. 28% -- as being perceived to have the highest ethical standards. This may reflect Clinton's personal association with legal and ethical problems during the Clinton White House, such as the Whitewater land deal, "Filegate," and the removal of White House gifts at the end of Bill Clinton's presidency.

Survey Methods

Results for this panel study are based on telephone interviews with 504 Democrats or Democratic leaners, aged 18 and older, conducted Jan. 25-28, 2007. Respondents were randomly drawn from Gallup's nationally representative household panel, which was originally recruited through random selection methods. For results based on the total sample of national adults, one can say with 95% confidence that the margin of sampling error is ±5 percentage points.

In addition to sampling error, question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of public opinion polls.

Digg Delicious Facebook Fark Google Newsvine Reddit Yahoo

Comments

It's still early in the game, but make no mistake about it, the Democratic nomination is the game.

The winner will be the next President.


I think we should ban all polls on presidential candidates. Who cares what other people think? Vote for the candidate you believe in.


Paul I do not see a candidate to vote for yet. None of the Republicans at all. I see a Democrat but I do not know much about him yet.


Higher ethical standards than Hillary "soft money" Clinton is like saying Obama is slimmer than Star Jones.


I agree with Paul. Polls are a problem given the herd mentality. The candidates need to continually reassess their chances, but the problem is when polls get published.

This doesn't just apply to elections, but to national issues as well (e.g., Iraq). Kind of like expectations theory or a self-fulfilling prophecy - if you think something will happen because others think it will happen, then it will happen. (e.g. a defeatist mentality, for lack of a better term).

Where is Richardson? I want to hear about him. No one talks about him. I'd have to go hunting for that info.


The Democrats have a group of young,bright candidates this time,one of which will be our next President.

Please,no more "Angry Old White Guys"!


Hillary and Edwards both flip-flopped on their vote to go to war in 2003.They both knew elections were right around the corner and they had to seem to be strong on defense issues.
Following the dem agenda,they turned yellow in a time of war and claim they were mis-led by President Bush.The only problem is, "before" Bush was president they both said Saddam had W.M.D's,was a threat to the region,"supported terrorism" and was re-developing his missile system.
This type of Monday morning quarterbacking,or flip-flopping, is a sign of weakness,flawed character and no leadership qualities.
Atleast Barack "Hussein" Obama hasn't flip-flopped...yet.
Paulo


Let's talk about flip flops Paulo-

"Started off as a humanitarian mission and it changed into a nation-building mission, and that's where the mission went wrong. The mission was changed. And as a result, our nation paid a price. And so I don't think our troops ought to be used for what's called nation-building. I think our troops ought to be used to fight and win war. I think our troops ought to be used to help overthrow the dictator when it's in our best interests. But in this case it was a nation-building exercise, and same with Haiti. I wouldn't have supported either." George W. Bush, 2nd Presidential Debate 2000.

He sure seems to love nation-building now, doesn't he?


The Repubs keep recycling the same losers for President hopeing for a different outcome i.e. McCain.

Hey Mark,

How about a post story on the CIA Leak trial?

Sounds like the guys down at the local DC Federal Prison are going to have a new "Scooter" to ride pretty soon.


Tony--
Iraq,a humanatarian mission??? You're a goof.
After W.W.2 did we leave Germany and Japan without helping them re-build?

Paulo


Paulo, the humnanitarian mission he was refering to was Somalia, which he supported us pulling out of before we achieved "Victory".

GWB didn't seem to think re-building countries was an appropriate goal for the military. What a goof. Now he's a flip flopping goof.


Tony-
But I was talking about Iraq and Hillary/Edwards flip-flopping on their vote.
This is not good leadeship,more like a cowardly action to bend with the polling numbers.
Paulo


Paulo, if flip flopping is cowardly for Clinton and Edwards, why isn't it cowardly for GWB?


Paulo again they voted on the lies told by Bush. Bush lied to take us to war. And Cherry picked Intell to do it. Grow up will you please and debate with facts


John E.: We need one more "old guy" that can save us from the designing lady and the inexperienced boy. Al Gore must get into the fray and save us from losing this election. A Gore/Obama ticket will win and give we dems a shot at 16 years in the White House


c. perry,

sweet


Tony,

Has any significant event occurred since that 2nd 2000 presidential debate that may have forced a change of course in the "nationbuilding" arguement?

DP,

President Bush rec'd faulty intellgence just like the senators, no lies.


Terry,
That's garbage. The VP and President knew there was internal debate in the intelligence agencies on the evidence they presented. They later acknowledged those 16 words never should have made it into the State of the Union Address. They knew other intelligence agencies found Curveball to be an unreliable, if not deranged, source. They presented the case as if it was a slamdunk eventhough inspectors on the ground could not find any evidence of WMD or active weapons programs.


"Has any significant event occurred since that 2nd 2000 presidential debate that may have forced a change of course in the "nationbuilding" arguement?"

Of course, Terry. Just as there have been significant developments that should force a change of course in Iraq, and to show that the initial authorization of the war was a grave mistake. That was the whole point of my comment.


The Gallup people released the results of the same poll, but the GOP side of it, today. Note that while Mr. Silva evidently couldn't wait to post about the Dems polling data (8:25 a.m.), he hasn't so far (written at 1:30 p.m.) posted the Republican results. Which is in keeping with his, and the "Swamp"s", "only interested in our fellow Democrats" theme.


Good God Bruce do you ever have anything to say about anything besides insulting the authors of this blog? I've been coming here for at least 6 months and every day its the same worthless, one- note tripe about the "liberal media" bogeyman.

If the media was really so liberal, they would have never jumped on the Iraq bandwagon and helped bring this nation recklessly into that ill-conceived endeavor.


Tony,

The President is changing his playbook to try and achieve victory.


Post a comment

(Anonymous comments will not be posted. Comments aren't posted immediately. They're screened for relevance to the topic, obscenity, spam and over-the-top personal attacks. We can't always get them up as soon as we'd like so please be patient. Thanks for visiting The Swamp.)

Please enter the letter "u" in the field below: