by Mark Silva
Finally, something that all the candidates can agree upon: Memorial Day.
Their salutes today to those who have served and sacrificed for the nation, and to those who are serving today, follow a common thread.
Yet Republican Sen. John McCain, who served in the Navy for 22 years and was held as a prisoner-of-war for five and a half, takes exception today with a fellow honored veteran's approach to a new GI Bill - that of Sen. Jim Webb of Virginia.
And McCain, addressing fellow veterans in New Mexico at this hour, parts ways with both of his potential Democratic rivals for the White House over the war in Iraq.
"As we all know, the American people have grown sick and tired of the war in Iraq. I understand that, of course,'' McCain says today. "I, too, have been made sick at heart by the many mistakes made by civilian and military commanders and the terrible price we have paid for them. But we cannot react to those mistakes by embracing a course of action that will be an even greater mistake, a mistake of colossal historical proportions, which will -- and I am sure of this -- seriously endanger the security of the country I have served all my adult life.
"To walk away now -- before the Iraqi government can fully protect its people from ruthless enemies -- would strengthen al Qaeda, empower Iran and other hostile powers in the Middle East, unleash a full scale civil war in Iraq that could quite possibly provoke genocide there, and destabilize the entire region as neighboring powers come to the aid of their favored factions. The consequences would threaten us for years, and I am certain would eventually draw us into a wider and more difficult war that would impose even greater sacrifices on us.
"Our defeat in Iraq would be catastrophic, not just for Iraq, but for us. I cannot be complicit in it,'' McCain says in his speech, with a campaign-text provided below. "I will do whatever I can, whether I am effective or not, to help avert it.''
See the candidates' statements, and McCain's speech here:
Democratic Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois released this statement today:
"On this Memorial Day, our nation honors the generations of patriots who were willing to give their lives to defend this country. While we may come from different places, cherish different traditions, and have different political beliefs, all Americans hold in reverence those who've given this country the full measure of their devotion. They are a shining example of what's best about America.
"Today is also a reminder of our obligation as Americans to serve our fallen heroes as well as they served us; as well as the wounded warriors I've had the honor of meeting at Walter Reed have served us; as well as the troops in Iraq, Afghanistan, and around the world are serving us. That means giving the same priority to building a 21st century VA as to building a 21st century military. It means having zero tolerance for veterans sleeping on our streets. It means bringing home our POWs and MIAs. And it means treating the graves of veterans like the hallowed ground it is and banning protests near funerals.
"So on this day, of all days, let's memorialize our fallen heroes by honoring all who wear our country's uniform; and by completing their work to make America more secure and our world more free."
Democratic Sen. Hillary Clinton of New York issued this statement:
"Memorial Day is a solemn day for every American; a day to express our profound gratitude to the men and women who have given their lives in military service. A day to join in our thoughts and prayers with the families mourning loved ones. A day to cherish the freedoms and opportunities that so many have served, sacrificed, and died to defend.
On this Memorial Day, I'm reminded of the words of a poet and a veteran named Archibald MacLeish. He served in World War I and witnessed incredible service and sacrifice. Before the close of World War II, to commemorate those who had died, he wrote of the responsibility of all of us who survive them.
In his poem entitled "The Young Dead Soldiers Do Not Speak," he reminds us that those we have lost: "have a silence that speaks for them at night...They say: We have done what we could but until it is finished it is not done...They say: our deaths are not ours; they are yours; they will mean what you make them...They say: we leave you our deaths. Give them their meaning."
How do we give these lives their meaning? I believe we must honor our service members by doing our best to serve the men and women who have served us. And I believe we must honor the lives we've lost by honoring the values for which they fought. That is our duty. And on this Memorial Day, let us recommit ourselves to fulfilling this sacred responsibility every single day.
The United States has the finest military on the planet because we have the best soldiers, sailors, airmen, Marines, and Coast Guardsmen in the world. We owe them our support and resources while in-service and when they come home as our Veterans. We owe them a GI Bill of Rights that sees to their health care, housing, education and overall wellbeing. In many ways, everyday should be Memorial Day to honor and remember all they do for our nation, our communities and our families.
Our moral obligation is significant for the simple reason that the sacrifice of those who serve and have served in our military demonstrates a profound example of commitment and love for our nation. We must return to them all they have given and we must remember and honor those who gave their all, their lives, for our great nation."
This is the speech that Sen. McCain, of Arizona, is delivering in New Mexico at this hour:
"Thank you. I'm always grateful for the opportunity, and pleased to be in the company of Americans who have had the burden of serving our country in distant lands, and the honor of having proved your patriotism in difficult circumstances.
I was blessed to have been born into a family who made their living at sea in defense of our security and ideals. My grandfather was a naval aviator; my father a submariner. And it was nearly pre-ordained that I would find a place in my family's profession, and that occupation would one day take me to war. Such was not the case for many of you. Your ambitions might not have led you to war; the honors you sought were not kept hidden on battlefields. Many of you were citizen-soldiers. You answered the call when it came; took up arms for your country's sake; and fought to the limit of your ability because you believed America's security was as much your responsibility as it was the professional soldier's. And when you came home, you built a better a country than the one you inherited. It's a privilege to be in your company.
The sacrifices made by veterans deserve to be memorialized in something more lasting than marble or bronze or in the fleeting effect of a politician's speeches. Your valor and devotion to duty have earned your country's abiding concern for your welfare. And when our government forgets to honor our debts to you, it is a stain upon America's honor. The Walter Reed scandal recalled, I hope, not just government but the public who elected it, to our responsibilities to the men and women who risked life and limb to meet their responsibilities to us. Such a disgrace is unworthy of the greatest nation on earth. As the greatest leaders in our history, George Washington and Abraham Lincoln, instructed us, care for Americans who fought to defend us should rank among the highest of national priorities.
Those who have borne the burden of war for our sake must be treated fairly and expeditiously as they seek compensation for disability or illness. We owe them compassion, knowledge and hands-on care in their transition to civilian life. We owe them training, rehabilitation and education. We owe their families, parents and caregivers our concern and support. They should never be deprived of quality medical care and mental health care coverage for illness or injury incurred as a result of their service to our country.
As President, I will do everything in my power to ensure that those who serve today and those who have served in the past have access to the highest quality health, mental health and rehabilitative care in the world. The disgrace of Walter Reed must not be forgotten. Neither should we accept a situation in which veterans are denied access to care due to great travel distances, backlogs of appointments, and years of pending disability evaluation and claims. I believe we should give veterans the option to use a simple plastic card to receive timely and accessible care at a convenient location through a provider of their choosing. We should no longer tolerate requiring veterans to make an appointment to stand in line to make an appointment to stand in line for substandard care of the injuries you have suffered to keep our country safe. Whatever our commitments to veterans cost, we will keep them, as you have kept every co mmitment to us. The honor of a great nation is at stake.
I also believe we should provide veterans with a substantial increase in educational benefits. I have joined with colleagues to offer legislation that will do just that. The bill we have sponsored would increase monthly education benefits to $1500; eliminate the $1200 enrollment fee; and offer $1000 annually for books and supplies. Importantly, we would allow veterans to transfer those benefits to their spouses or dependent children or use a part of them to pay down existing student loans. We also increase benefits to the Guard and Reserve, and even more generously to those who serve in the Selected Reserve.
I know that my friend and fellow veteran, Senator Jim Webb, an honorable man who takes his responsibility to veterans very seriously, has also offered legislation that would provide more generous benefits. Both Senator Webb and I are united in our deep appreciation for the men and women who risk their lives so that the rest of us may be secure in our freedom. And I take a backseat to no one in my affection, respect and devotion to veterans. I grew up in the Navy; served for twenty-two years as a naval officer; and, like Senator Webb, personally experienced the terrible costs war imposes on the veteran. The friendships I formed in war remain among the closest relationships in my life. The Navy is still the world I know best and love most.
But, as you might know, I am running for the office of Commander-in-Chief. That is the highest privilege in this country, and it imposes the greatest responsibilities. And this is why I am committed to our bill, despite the support Senator Webb's bill has received. It would be easier politically for me to have joined Senator Webb in offering his legislation. More importantly, I feel just as he does, that we owe veterans the respect and generosity of a great nation because no matter how generously we show our gratitude it will never compensate them fully for all the sacrifices they have borne on our behalf.
The most important difference between our two approaches is that Senator Webb offers veterans who served one enlistment the same benefits as those offered veterans who have re-enlisted several times. Our bill has a sliding scale that offers generous benefits to all veterans, but increases those benefits according to the veteran's length of service. It is important to do that because, otherwise, we will encourage more people to leave the military after they have completed one enlistment. At a time when the United States military is fighting in two wars, and as we finally are beginning the long overdue and very urgent necessity of increasing the size of the Army and Marine Corps, one study estimates that Senator Webb's bill will reduce retention rates by 16 percent.
Most worrying to me, is that by hurting retention we will reduce the numbers of men and women who we train to become the backbone of all the services, the noncommissioned officer. In my life, I have learned more from noncommissioned officers I have known and served with than anyone else outside my family. And in combat, no one is more important to their soldiers, sailors, marines, and airmen, and to the officers who command them, than the sergeant and petty officer. They are very hard to replace. Encouraging people to choose to not become noncommissioned officers would hurt the military and our country very badly. As I said, the office of President, which I am seeking, is a great honor, indeed, but it imposes serious responsibilities. How faithfully the President discharges those responsibilities will determine whether he or she deserves the honor. I can only tell you, I intend to deserve the honor if I am fortunate to rece ive it, even if it means I must take politically unpopular positions at times and disagree with people for whom I have the highest respect and affection.
Now, I would like to end by discussing the subject that concerns all of us more than anything else, the war in Iraq. When I was five years old, a car pulled up in front of our house in New London, Connecticut, and a Navy officer rolled down the window, and shouted at my father that the Japanese had bombed Pearl Harbor. My father immediately left for the submarine base where he was stationed. I rarely saw him again for four years. My grandfather, who commanded the fast carrier task force under Admiral Halsey, came home from the war exhausted from the burdens he had borne, and died the next day. In Vietnam, where I formed the closest friendships of my life, some of those friends never came home to the country they loved so well. I detest war. It might not be the worst thing to befall human beings, but it is wretched beyond all description. When nations seek to resolve their differences by force of arms, a million tragedies en sue. The lives of a nation's finest patriots are sacrificed. Innocent people suffer and die. Commerce is disrupted; economies are damaged; strategic interests shielded by years of patient statecraft are endangered as the exigencies of war and diplomacy conflict. Not the valor with which it i00s fought nor the nobility of the cause it serves, can glorify war. Whatever gains are secured, it is loss the veteran remembers most keenly. Only a fool or a fraud sentimentalizes the merciless reality of war. However heady the appeal of a call to arms, however just the cause, we should still shed a tear for all that is lost when war claims its wages from us.
As we meet, in Iraq and Afghanistan, American soldiers, Marines, sailors and airmen are fighting bravely and tenaciously in battles that are as dangerous, difficult and consequential as the great battles of our armed forces' storied past. As we all know, the American people have grown sick and tired of the war in Iraq. I understand that, of course. I, too, have been made sick at heart by the many mistakes made by civilian and military commanders and the terrible price we have paid for them. But we cannot react to those mistakes by embracing a course of action that will be an even greater mistake, a mistake of colossal historical proportions, which will -- and I am sure of this -- seriously endanger the security of the country I have served all my adult life.
We have new commanders in Iraq, and they are following a counterinsurgency strategy that we should have been following from the beginning, which makes the most effective use of our strength and doesn't strengthen the tactics of our enemy. This new battle plan is succeeding where our previous tactics failed. The Government of Iraq and the Iraqi Army are now taking more responsibility for the security of their own country and fighting successfully in Basra, Sadr City and Mosul. We must give General Petraeus and the Americans he has the honor to command adequate time to salvage from the wreckage of our past mistakes a measure of stability for Iraq and the Middle East, and a more secure future for the American people.
To walk away now -- before the Iraqi government can fully protect its people from ruthless enemies -- would strengthen al Qaeda, empower Iran and other hostile powers in the Middle East, unleash a full scale civil war in Iraq that could quite possibly provoke genocide there, and destabilize the entire region as neighboring powers come to the aid of their favored factions. The consequences would threaten us for years, and I am certain would eventually draw us into a wider and more difficult war that would impose even greater sacrifices on us.
Our defeat in Iraq would be catastrophic, not just for Iraq, but for us. I cannot be complicit in it. I will do whatever I can, whether I am effective or not, to help avert it. That is all I can offer my country. It is not much compared to the sacrifices made by Americans who have volunteered to fight this war for us. I know that and am humbled by it. But though my duty is neither dangerous nor onerous, it compels me nonetheless to say to my fellow Americans, as long as we have the opportunity to succeed we must try to succeed. And I firmly believe that, with the continued right course of action, we will succeed.
I have many responsibilities to the American people, and I take them all seriously. But I have one responsibility that outweighs all the others and that is to use whatever talents I possess, and every resource God has granted me to protect the security of this great and good nation from all enemies foreign and domestic. And that I intend to do, even if I must stand athwart popular opinion. I will attempt to convince as many of my countrymen as I can that we must show even greater patience, though our patience is nearly exhausted, and that as long as there is a reasonable prospect for succeeding in this war then we must not choose to lose it. That is how I construe my responsibility to my country. That is how I construed it yesterday. It is how I construe it today. It is how I will construe it tomorrow. I do not know how I could choose any other course.
The war in Iraq has divided the American people, but it has divided no American in our admiration for the men and women who are fighting for us there. It is every veteran's hope that should their children be called upon to answer a call to arms, the battle will be necessary and the field well chosen. But that is not their responsibility. It belongs to the government that called them. As it once was for us, their honor will be in their answer not their summons. Whatever we think about how and why we went to war in Iraq, we are all -- those who supported the decision that placed them in harm's way and those who opposed it -- humbled by and grateful for their example. They now deserve the distinction of the best Americans, and we owe them a debt we can never fully repay. We can only offer the small tribute of our humility and our commitment to do all that we can do, in less trying and costly circumstances, to help ke ep this nation worthy of their sacrifice.
Many of them have served multiple tours in Iraq and Afghanistan. Many have had their tours extended. Many have returned to combat sooner than they had been led to expect. It is a sad and hard thing to ask so much more of Americans who have already given more than their fair share to the defense of our country. Few of them and their families will have received the news about additional and longer deployments without aiming a few appropriate complaints in the general direction of people like me, who helped make the decision to send them there. And then they shouldered a rifle and risked everything -- everything -- to accomplish their mission, to protect another people's freedom and our own country from harm.
It is a privilege beyond measure to live in a country served by them. I have lived a long, eventful and blessed life. I have had the good fortune to know personally a great many brave and selfless patriots who sacrificed and shed blood to defend America. But I have known none braver or better than those who do so today. They are our inspiration, as I suspect all of you were once theirs. And I pray to a loving God that He bless and protect them. Thank you.''







Comments
Thank you senator McCain, a veteran speaking for our soldiers. After senator Obama totally ignored our soldiers in his remarks at Wesleyan University it's nice to know that someone remembers them and the sacrifice they've made for all of us on this memorial day weekend.
Posted by: Jeff | May 26, 2008 1:06 PM
"I, too, have been made sick at heart by the many mistakes made by civilian and military commanders and the terrible price we have paid for them."
- Sen. John McCain
Of course, this does not include the ultimate civilian commander, namely President George W. Bush. And, thus, the so-called "Straight-Talk Express" is once again derailed.
Posted by: Bud McFarlin | May 26, 2008 1:20 PM
Iraq is a foolhardy civil war of choice with no end in sight. In McCain wants to do right by our military, he should advocate a sooner rather than later withdraw.
Posted by: Doug "Hussein" Zook | May 26, 2008 1:54 PM
Given your first comment is from "Jeff," who criticizes Obama's Wesleyan speech, I must counter, perhaps appropriately given that McCain attacks the GI Bill: Obama was speaking to graduating students. He was speaking to their future, and he would have been WRONG to take that time away from them to speak about the armed forces. What he did instead was encourage those students to take up the cause in their own ways - to battle ignorance and poverty and hunger and whatever else needs battling. A real leader does not just lead with guns, thank you.
Perhaps it is appropriate in that context to consider that McCain doesn't want people who have served in the military to get a decent education.
Posted by: bekbek | May 26, 2008 2:01 PM
Bek Bek, the question is why didn't Obama include military service in the "public service" he touted in his speech at Wesleyan?
The topic of the speech was national service and in the course of it Obama talked about his own experience a bit and tied it into the Kennedy legacy as he interprets it.
He called on the graduates to enter national service and spoke approvingly of the following:
The Peace Corps (he is very big on this)
The Foreign Service (State Dept)
Community organizing
Civil rights work
Anti-poverty and charity organizing
Teaching and tutoring
Environment and alternate energy work
Political activism
Notice anything missing here?
Yes, Obama failed to make any mention, in any part of his speech, of the men and women serving in our military. On Memorial Day weekend. In a time of war. A war we are winning. Not a single word.
Well, actually, there was one mention. I noted the discussion of political activism. It turns out that it's only national service when you work for certain candidates or causes. And those would be left-wing candidates and causes. Obama specifically mentioned poverty and peace.
What he said was:"In a time of war, you must work for peace."
And that was it, the only mention of war. Be assured that as far as Obama is concerned, you were not performing national service if you were in the military. You were most definitely not serving your country. But if I went to a recruiting center or a training or base camp and threw red paint around and screamed antiwar slogans, Barack would say I was serving my country.
P.S. Deaths are at a four-year low in Iraq and General Petraeus said there will be a further drawdown of troops in September so please go on with that unwinnable claptrap knowing that it has no connection to reality.
Posted by: Jeff | May 26, 2008 2:29 PM
P.S. It's not "the GI Bill" it's Jim Webb's bill that the Pentagon opposes. The real GI Bill is the republican one that offers the same level of education. So it's a lie that McCain doesn't want people who have served in the military to get a decent education. Just a boldaced lie that's typical of the Obama campaign which has been said to deal in "rank falsehood," "intentionally twisting" and other deceptions by non-partisan factcheckers like factcheck.org. Pretty typical.
Posted by: Jeff | May 26, 2008 2:39 PM
A real leader does not just lead with guns, thank you.
Perhaps it is appropriate in that context to consider that McCain doesn't want people who have served in the military to get a decent education.
Posted by: bekbek | May 26, 2008 2:01 PM
Very well put! McCains ad hominem attack on Barack Obama, claiming he had no right to tell McCain anything about veterans affairs was very sad. Instead of lashing out at Obama on a personal level he could have used the airtime to explain that the reason he didn't support the bill was because he thinks it will give troops an insentive to opt out early and hinder retention. This basically shows you everything you need to know about McCains foreign policy objectives. MORE WAR. Remember this is memorial day. G-d bless our troops. Past present and future. :)
2006 Senator McCain supported the interests of the Disabled American Veterans 20 percent in 2006.
2006 In 2006 Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America gave Senator McCain a grade of D.
2006 Senator McCain sponsored or co-sponsored 18 percent of the legislation favored by the The Retired Enlisted Association in 2006.
2005 Senator McCain supported the interests of the Disabled American Veterans 25 percent in 2005.
2004 Senator McCain supported the interests of the Disabled American Veterans 50 percent in 2004.
2004 Senator McCain supported the interests of the The Retired Enlisted Association 0 percent in 2004.
John McCain pays lip service to veteran support, but very little else. The Obama campaign should throw everything at him and not stop until the election.
Posted by: Logic Prisoner | May 26, 2008 2:53 PM
Jeff, I think you need to remember that the government provides policy to the Pentagon, not the Pentagon to the government. Your Republican buddies haven't succeded in turniing this into a military state yet. But then you must know that because, if they had, you'd be serving in Iraq, rather than just posting about how wonderful a war you're too cowardly to fight in is.
Jeff, how many times did McCain mention poverty or the poor in his "2013" fantasy speech?
Posted by: Victor | May 26, 2008 3:11 PM
Please. If McCain truely cared about our troops he wouldn't fuss about the money the vets get for education. It bothers my military family that he has stabbed us in the back for the last time. Whatever happens in Iraq is going to happen when we leave. Why prolong it?
Posted by: Daniel | May 26, 2008 3:14 PM
Good, you've just proven that the non-partisan analysts in our civilian government are against Webb's panderfest.
p.s. Maybe he didn't mention the poor because there will be no poor in 2013 with McCain in charge ;) They'll all be wealthy.
Posted by: Jeff | May 26, 2008 3:26 PM
Yes, Senator McCain, Americans have grown "sick and tired" of the Iraq War. For that reason, we have no inclination to vote for a candidate who intends to continue the war indefinitely.
Americans were stupid to re-elect Bush in 2004. Americans will be nine times more stupid if they elect McCain in 2008.
Posted by: Tom in California | May 26, 2008 3:35 PM
John McCain sold his soul to the RNC store when he embraced Dubya and KKKarl Rove subsequent to the smear team Dubya perpetrated on him in South Carolina in 2000.
He has no shame.
Posted by: Doug "Hussein" Zook | May 26, 2008 4:09 PM
He has no shame.
Posted by: Doug "Hussein" Zook | May 26, 2008 4:09 PM
I agree that you have no shame, Doug.
Posted by: Jeff | May 26, 2008 4:44 PM
Thank you, Senator Obama, for speaking brilliantly to our youth and reminding them of their responsibilities to our great nation. Thank you, Senator Obama, for maintaining your cool in the kitchen with all the heat the Clintonistas could muster, from the race card to the sex card. You have handled it all brilliantly. Last, but not least, thanks for providing a serious alternative to Senator " Questionable Conduct " McCain and the Ridiculous Republicans and their disastrous 8 years. America will be a better country, once the Ridiculous Republicans have been retired !!
SUPPORT OUR TROOPS, BRING THEM HOME, ALIVE. NOW.
Posted by: Don Fitzgerald, Chicago | May 26, 2008 7:43 PM
Farewell Frank Dean, Lorin Long, William Lee. The CP wasn't strong enough, the Forrestal was not safe, the NVA trail you walked, not secure. Never was or could be.
I thought I knew you, 40 years ago, but I don't know you now. You have lost your lives for a far off Asian mistake so long ago. If only I could see you once more I may learn the secret to your own truth and lost life. Has my life, anyones life, honored yours?
Fare thee well, Frank, Lorin and Bill.
Posted by: C.Morris | May 26, 2008 8:19 PM
I think its about time we have a president who understands the military. You don't go to an enemy castle destroy the walls and outer fortress but leave his keep intact. The truth is if we leave now we invite bigger conflict. I predict 10 years or so another Saddam type will rise up Al Quaeda will regain their strength and the whole thing will start over again. We have to finish what we started. I would love for the war to be over I don't look forward to going to the desert and I don't like seeing my felow Airmen and friends going in harms way. But the truth is it has to be done and if we don't finish what we started it will be devastating in the long run. We will eventually have to return. And this time we will have to deal with an enemy which is at full strength again. Then how many more will have to die get us back to where we are now. I made a decision I saw it heard it and I was tired of just sitting around and doing nothing saying "thats terrible what's happening over there", instead I decided I'm going to do something about it. And here I am about to go where only the true brave souls in this world dare tread. To all those who say pull out now I have this to say. You say you support our troops, then respectfully let us do our job.This is what we do so let us do it. Let the military make the military decisions. We all have friends, sons, daughters, fathers, and mothers who are out there fighting putting themselves in harms way. But this is what we do it is what we are trained for. Would you see your loved ones home only to see them go back when things are even worse? We must finish what we started. Tactically and morally it would be a devastating mistake which would come back to haunt us if we did anything less.
Posted by: Victor | May 27, 2008 6:37 AM
"Let the military make the military decisions."
No sorry, we won't. This nation is built on the principal of civilian control of the military. This is not a miltary state, and I hope to God it never becomes one.
The military needs to remember that it exists to serve the needs of the nation, the nation does nor exist to serve the needs of the military.
Posted by: Lois | May 27, 2008 9:31 AM
Obama yesterday, in a prepared speech, said, "On this Memorial Day, the nation honors its fallen heroes. And I see many here in the audience today." What, was he speaking to rows of cadavers? Goof-up number 928 for Obama. And the media didn't even report it. The question is not whether Obama is stupid; the question is how much?
Posted by: Graydon | May 27, 2008 1:00 PM